Celeron 927UE vs Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Celeron 927UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2960 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | 2x Athlon 64 (Desktop) | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 0.63 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2007) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Celeron 927UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1000 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Celeron 927UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Celeron 927UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron 927UE, on the other hand, has a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Celeron 927UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is a desktop processor while Celeron 927UE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Celeron 927UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
