Ryzen 7 3700U vs Athlon 64 X2 4000+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Ryzen 7 3700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1302
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiencyno data28.39
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Ryzen 7 3700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache256 KB384 KB
L2 cache512K2 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm12 nm
Die size220 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors154 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Ryzen 7 3700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM2FP5
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Ryzen 7 3700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Ryzen 7 3700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Ryzen 7 3700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Ryzen 7 3700U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 692
Ryzen 7 3700U 7150
+933%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 195
Ryzen 7 3700U 928
+376%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 363
Ryzen 7 3700U 2696
+643%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 3700U has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 493.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Ryzen 7 3700U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 3700U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Ryzen 7 3700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Ryzen 7 3700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 190 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1442 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4000+ or Ryzen 7 3700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.