Atom x5-Z8330 vs Athlon 64 X2 4000+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Atom x5-Z8330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2869
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Airmont (2016)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Atom x5-Z8330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.92 GHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache512K2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size220 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors154 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Atom x5-Z8330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM2no data
Power consumption (TDP)89 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Atom x5-Z8330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Atom x5-Z8330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Identity Protection-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Atom x5-Z8330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L-RS 1600
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Atom x5-Z8330 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Atom x5-Z8330.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data1
USB revisionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 692
Atom x5-Z8330 809
+16.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 195
+7.1%
Atom x5-Z8330 182

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 363
Atom x5-Z8330 570
+57%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

Atom x5-Z8330 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Atom x5-Z8330. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is a desktop processor while Atom x5-Z8330 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Atom x5-Z8330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Atom x5-Z8330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 190 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 9 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4000+ or Atom x5-Z8330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.