Xeon w7-3455 vs Athlon 64 TF-20

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 TF-20
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.16
Xeon w7-3455
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 270 Watt
36.76
+22875%

Xeon w7-3455 outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 22875% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w7-3455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking328092
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data41.68
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency0.6112.88
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,489

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w7-3455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads148
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache0.1 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data67.5 MB
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w7-3455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g1FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w7-3455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus ProtectionIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w7-3455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w7-3455 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w7-3455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w7-3455.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 36.76
Recency 1 May 2009 15 February 2023
Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 48
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 270 Watt

Athlon 64 TF-20 has 980% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3455, on the other hand, has a 22875% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads.

The Xeon w7-3455 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon 64 TF-20 is a notebook processor while Xeon w7-3455 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w7-3455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20
Intel Xeon w7-3455
Xeon w7-3455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 34 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 TF-20 or Xeon w7-3455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.