Phenom X4 9750B vs Athlon 64 TF-20

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon 64no data
Power efficiencyno data0.96
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)Agena (2007−2008)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache0.1 MB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data285 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g1AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protectionno data
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 95 Watt

Athlon 64 TF-20 has 280% lower power consumption.

Phenom X4 9750B, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon 64 TF-20 is a notebook processor while Phenom X4 9750B is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20
AMD Phenom X4 9750B
Phenom X4 9750B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 34 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9750B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 TF-20 or Phenom X4 9750B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.