Phenom X4 9750B vs Athlon 64 TF-20
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2489 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Athlon 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.95 |
| Architecture codename | Sherman (2009) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) | August 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 0.1 MB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 285 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 450 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1g1 | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 95 Watt |
Athlon 64 TF-20 has 280% lower power consumption.
Phenom X4 9750B, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon 64 TF-20 is a notebook processor while Phenom X4 9750B is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Phenom X4 9750B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
