D-1513N vs Athlon 64 TF-20
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3280 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Athlon 64 | Intel Xeon D |
| Power efficiency | 0.61 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Sherman (2009) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $192 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | 0.1 MB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246.24 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | S1g1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 29.861 GB/s |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Athlon 64 TF-20 has 40% lower power consumption.
D-1513N, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon 64 TF-20 is a notebook processor while D-1513N is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
