Athlon 64 2700+ vs Athlon 64 TF-20

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 2700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon 64no data
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)NewCastle (2004)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)April 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 2700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache0.1 MB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data144 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data69 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 2700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g1754
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 2700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protectionno data
VirusProtect+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 32 Watt

Athlon 64 TF-20 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 28% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 2700+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 2700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20
AMD Athlon 64 2700+
Athlon 64 2700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 34 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 TF-20 or Athlon 64 2700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.