Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 vs Athlon 64 LE-1620

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 LE-1620 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release dateOctober 2007 (17 years ago)June 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 LE-1620 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache128K8 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die size230 mm2131 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °C75 °C
Number of transistors227 million55 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 LE-1620 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2478
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt68 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 LE-1620 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 LE-1620 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR1, DDR2

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 68 Watt

Athlon 64 LE-1620 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 51.1% lower power consumption.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 LE-1620 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 LE-1620 is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 LE-1620 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 LE-1620
Athlon 64 LE-1620
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 14 votes

Rate Athlon 64 LE-1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 8 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 LE-1620 or Mobile Pentium 4 2.80, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.