Athlon 64 3500+ EE vs Athlon 64 3600+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3600+ and Athlon 64 3500+ EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3029not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.40no data
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Orleans (2007−2009)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)February 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3600+ and Athlon 64 3500+ EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache128K128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm90 nm
Die size193 mm2183 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors106 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3600+ and Athlon 64 3500+ EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754AM2
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt35 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and Athlon 64 3500+ EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon 64 3500+ EE has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3600+ and Athlon 64 3500+ EE. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3600+ and Athlon 64 3500+ EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3600+
Athlon 64 3600+
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ EE
Athlon 64 3500+ EE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 3500 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3600+ or Athlon 64 3500+ EE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.