A10-8700P vs Athlon 64 3600+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3600+ and A10-8700P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2196
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Carrizo
Power efficiencyno data3.81
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3600+ and A10-8700P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache128Kno data
L2 cache1 MB2048 KB
Chip lithography130 nm28 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors106 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3600+ and A10-8700P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754FP4
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt12 - 35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and A10-8700P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and A10-8700P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and A10-8700P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 3600+ and A10-8700P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and A10-8700P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and A10-8700P.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 3600+ 601
A10-8700P 2245
+274%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 12 Watt

A10-8700P has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 641.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3600+ and A10-8700P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 3600+ is a desktop processor while A10-8700P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3600+ and A10-8700P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3600+
Athlon 64 3600+
AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 119 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3600+ or A10-8700P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.