Itanium 9310 vs Athlon 300U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 300U and Itanium 9310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1772not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency15.32no data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge 2 (2019)no data
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 300U and Itanium 9310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)10 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 300U and Itanium 9310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFP5FCLGA1248
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 300U and Itanium 9310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data50 Bit
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Athlon 300U and Itanium 9310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 300U and Itanium 9310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 300U and Itanium 9310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 300U and Itanium 9310.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 1 January 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 130 Watt

Athlon 300U has an age advantage of 9 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 300U and Itanium 9310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon 300U is a notebook processor while Itanium 9310 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 300U and Itanium 9310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U
Intel Itanium 9310
Itanium 9310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 460 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Itanium 9310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 300U or Itanium 9310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.