EPYC 9654 vs Athlon 300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.48
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
77.10
+3009%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Athlon 300U by a whopping 3009% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 300U and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17566
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.28
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD AthlonAMD EPYC
Power efficiency15.3619.89
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge 2 (2019)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 300U and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier2424
L1 cache192 KB6 MB
L2 cache1 MB96 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size209.78 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 300U and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 300U and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 300U and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 300U and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 300U and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 300U 2.48
EPYC 9654 77.10
+3009%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 300U 3867
EPYC 9654 120176
+3008%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.48 77.10
Recency 6 January 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 360 Watt

Athlon 300U has 2300% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 3008.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 4700% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 300U in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon 300U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 300U and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 459 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 300U or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.