Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Athlon 3000G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.82
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
2023
10 cores / 10 threads
13.73
+387%

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core outperforms Athlon 3000G by a whopping 387% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 3000G and M2 Pro 10-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1681545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD AthlonApple M-Series
Power efficiency7.63no data
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)no data
Release date7 November 2019 (5 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 3000G and M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads410
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache192 KB7.3 MB
L2 cache1 MB36 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size209.78 mm2?no data
Number of transistors4940 Million40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 3000G and M2 Pro 10-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and M2 Pro 10-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and M2 Pro 10-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and M2 Pro 10-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GB?no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Vega 3Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and M2 Pro 10-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 3000G 2.82
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 13.73
+387%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 3000G 4476
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 21802
+387%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.82 13.73
Recency 7 November 2019 17 January 2023
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 4 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core has a 386.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 400% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The M2 Pro 10-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 3000G in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 3000G is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 3000G and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
M2 Pro 10-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2112 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 112 votes

Rate M2 Pro 10-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 3000G or M2 Pro 10-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.