Athlon 64 X2 5400+ vs Athlon 1300

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 1300 and Athlon 64 X2 5400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2814
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data0.61
Architecture codenameThunderbird B (2000−2001)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date21 March 2001 (23 years ago)December 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$318no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 1300 and Athlon 64 X2 5400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache256 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography180 nm90 nm
Die size120 mm2220 mm2
Number of transistors37 million154 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 1300 and Athlon 64 X2 5400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAAM2
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt89 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 1300 and Athlon 64 X2 5400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 180 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 89 Watt

Athlon 1300 has 30.9% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 1300 and Athlon 64 X2 5400+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 1300 and Athlon 64 X2 5400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 1300
Athlon 1300
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Athlon 64 X2 5400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate Athlon 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 37 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 1300 or Athlon 64 X2 5400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.