Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs Athlon 1100
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 1100 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 712 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Thunderbird B (2000−2001) | no data |
| Release date | 14 August 2000 (24 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $853 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 1100 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 2.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 120 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 37 million | 33700 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 1100 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | A | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 1100 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU ( - 1296 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 August 2000 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 2060 Watt |
Athlon 1100 has 3333.3% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 21 year, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 1100 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 1100 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 1100 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
