Xeon E7-4880 v3 vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E7-4880 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 180 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 63.95 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Haswell-EX (2015) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E7-4880 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 36 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 45 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 160 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E7-4880 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 4 |
| Socket | no data | 1150 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 140 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E7-4880 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E7-4880 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E7-4880 v3 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E7-4880 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3, DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 20-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E7-4880 v3.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 1 June 2015 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 18 |
| Threads | 14 | 36 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 140 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has an age advantage of 9 years, a 633.3% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
Xeon E7-4880 v3, on the other hand, has 28.6% more physical cores and 157.1% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E7-4880 v3. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while Xeon E7-4880 v3 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E7-4880 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
