EPYC 7402P vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
27.96
+0.8%
EPYC 7402P
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
27.74

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) outperforms EPYC 7402P by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7402P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking167172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.05
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesApple M4AMD EPYC
Power efficiency82.2614.51
Architecture codenameno dataZen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7402P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1248
Base clock speed2.592 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.35 GHz
Multiplierno data28
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7402P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7402P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7402P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7402P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 16-core GPUno data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.96 27.74
Recency 30 October 2024 7 August 2019
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 12 48
Chip lithography 3 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 180 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 462.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7402P, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7402P.

Note that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop processor while EPYC 7402P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7402P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)
AMD EPYC 7402P
EPYC 7402P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 12 votes

Rate Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7402P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) or EPYC 7402P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.