Xeon Gold 6312U vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.04
+5.7%
Xeon Gold 6312U
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
26.52

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Xeon Gold 6312U by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6312U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking165184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M4no data
Power efficiency29.3313.50
Architecture codenameno dataIce Lake-SP (2021)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6312U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1648
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6312U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6312U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6312U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6312U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6312U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6312U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.04 26.52
Recency 30 October 2024 6 April 2021
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 16 48
Chip lithography 3 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 185 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 5.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 105.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6312U, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6312U.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6312U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Gold 6312U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
Xeon Gold 6312U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6312U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Xeon Gold 6312U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.