i3-3217U vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.02
+3539%
Core i3-3217U
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.77

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Core i3-3217U by a whopping 3539% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i3-3217U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1662648
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M4Intel Core i3
Power efficiency29.434.28
Architecture codenameno dataIvy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)1 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225

Detailed specifications

M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i3-3217U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data118 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i3-3217U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i3-3217U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AVX-+
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i3-3217U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i3-3217U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i3-3217U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 40-core GPUIntel HD Graphics 4000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i3-3217U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i3-3217U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.02 0.77
Recency 30 October 2024 1 June 2012
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 17 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 3539% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

i3-3217U, on the other hand, has 429.4% lower power consumption.

The M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3217U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i3-3217U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
Intel Core i3-3217U
Core i3-3217U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 13 votes

Rate M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 548 votes

Rate Core i3-3217U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M4 Max (16 cores) or Core i3-3217U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.