Atom x3-C3200RK vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 165 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | 3x Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 29.33 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Silvermont (2015) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 4 March 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| GPIO | no data | 4 x I2C |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3L-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 4.2 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 1 |
| MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | up to 1920x1080 |
| Max refresh rate | no data | 60 Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| OpenGL | no data | ES 2.0 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK.
| USB revision | no data | 2.0 OTG |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 1 |
| UART | no data | 2 x USIF configurable |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 4 March 2015 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Atom x3-C3200RK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
