Turion II Ultra M620 vs Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
Aggregate performance score
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core outperforms Turion II Ultra M620 by a whopping 2967% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Turion II Ultra M620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 439 | 2862 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M3 | AMD Turion II Ultra |
| Power efficiency | 54.59 | 1.37 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Turion II Ultra M620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 11 (Undeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 11 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 3600 MHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Number of transistors | 37000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Turion II Ultra M620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Turion II Ultra M620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.64 | 0.51 |
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 10 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 11 | 2 |
| Threads | 11 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 35 Watt |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core has a 2966.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 450% more physical cores and 450% more threads, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 29.6% lower power consumption.
The Apple M3 Pro 11-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Ultra M620 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Turion II Ultra M620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
