Ryzen 5 2600E vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core
Primary details
Comparing Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 5 2600E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 189 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple M3 | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Power efficiency | 31.33 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 19 September 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 5 2600E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 31 |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 92000 Million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 5 2600E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 5 2600E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 5 2600E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 5 2600E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 5 2600E.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 19 September 2018 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 65 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 16-Core has an age advantage of 5 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen 5 2600E, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 5 2600E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2600E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 5 2600E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
