Ryzen 3 3300 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

VS

Primary details

Comparing Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 3 3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking188not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple M3no data
Power efficiency31.30no data
Architecture codenameno dataZen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 3 3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads16no data
Base clock speed2.748 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm7 nm
Number of transistors92000 Million4800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 3 3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 3 3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 3 3300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 3 3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Max 40-Core GPUno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 6
Chip lithography 3 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 50 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has 166.7% more physical cores, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 3 3300, on the other hand, has 56% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 3 3300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 3300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen 3 3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
AMD Ryzen 3 3300
Ryzen 3 3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 267 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 32 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M3 Max 16-Core or Ryzen 3 3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.