Celeron J3455 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
25.85
+1720%
Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.42

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Celeron J3455 by a whopping 1720% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron J3455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1942205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple M3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency31.3613.44
Architecture codenameno dataApollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron J3455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.748 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz2.3 GHz
Multiplierno data15
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors92000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron J3455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron J3455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron J3455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron J3455 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron J3455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPUIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron J3455.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 25.85
+1720%
Celeron J3455 1.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 41068
+1723%
Celeron J3455 2253

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.85 1.42
Recency 30 October 2023 30 August 2016
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 10 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 1720.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J3455, on the other hand, has 680% lower power consumption.

The M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3455 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while Celeron J3455 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron J3455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 276 votes

Rate M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 229 votes

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M3 Max 16-Core or Celeron J3455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.