A10-9620P vs Apple M2

Place in the ranking	814	2106
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Apple Apple M-Series	Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency	44.45	10.09
Architecture codename	no data	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	10 June 2022 (2 years ago)	1 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

M2 and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	8	4
Base clock speed	2.424 GHz	2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.48 GHz	3.4 GHz
L1 cache	2 MB	no data
L2 cache	20 MB	2 MB
Chip lithography	5 nm	28 nm
Die size	no data	250 mm²
Maximum core temperature	no data	90 °C
Number of transistors	20000 Million	3100 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	no data	-

Compatibility

Information on M2 and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	no data	FP4
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	15 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)

AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 9.40
+488%

A10-9620P 1.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 14933
+488%

A10-9620P 2538

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M2 1215
+428%

A10-9620P 230

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Apple M2 223
+210%

A10-9620P 72

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.40	1.60
Recency	10 June 2022	1 January 2017
Physical cores	8	4
Threads	8	4
Chip lithography	5 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	15 Watt

Apple M2 has a 487.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

A10-9620P, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

The M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9620P in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and A10-9620P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.