Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs Apple M2 Max

VS

Primary details

Comparing Apple M2 Max and Ryzen Embedded 8640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking385not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency20.10no data
Architecture codenameno dataHawk Point (2024)
Release date17 January 2023 (1 year ago)2 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M2 Max and Ryzen Embedded 8640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed2.424 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache3.3 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache36 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Number of transistors67000 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Apple M2 Max and Ryzen Embedded 8640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP8
Power consumption (TDP)79 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M2 Max and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M2 Max and Ryzen Embedded 8640U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M2 Max and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPUAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M2 Max and Ryzen Embedded 8640U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 January 2023 2 April 2024
Physical cores 12 6
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 79 Watt 28 Watt

Apple M2 Max has 100% more physical cores.

Ryzen Embedded 8640U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 182.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M2 Max and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 Max and Ryzen Embedded 8640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2 Max
M2 Max
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U
Ryzen Embedded 8640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 233 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded 8640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M2 Max or Ryzen Embedded 8640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.