Xeon D-1813NT vs Apple M2 Max

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.81
+245%
Xeon D-1813NT
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 42 Watt
4.87

Apple M2 Max outperforms Xeon D-1813NT by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M2 Max and Xeon D-1813NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3941247
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency20.1210.97
Release date17 January 2023 (1 year ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

M2 Max and Xeon D-1813NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2.424 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache3.3 MBno data
L2 cache36 MBno data
L3 cache48 MB10240 KB
Chip lithography5 nmno data
Number of transistors67000 Millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on M2 Max and Xeon D-1813NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)79 Watt42 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 Max and Xeon D-1813NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

M2 Max and Xeon D-1813NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 Max and Xeon D-1813NT are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 Max and Xeon D-1813NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 Max 38-Core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 Max and Xeon D-1813NT.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 Max 16.81
+245%
Xeon D-1813NT 4.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 Max 26697
+245%
Xeon D-1813NT 7732

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.81 4.87
Recency 17 January 2023 1 October 2023
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 12 8
Power consumption (TDP) 79 Watt 42 Watt

Apple M2 Max has a 245.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Xeon D-1813NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 88.1% lower power consumption.

The M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1813NT in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M2 Max is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1813NT is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 Max and Xeon D-1813NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2 Max
M2 Max
Intel Xeon D-1813NT
Xeon D-1813NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 236 votes

Rate M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1813NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M2 Max or Xeon D-1813NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.