Processor N200 vs Apple M1

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1
2020
8 cores / 8 threads
5.19
+233%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

Apple M1 outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M1 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11922107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple Apple M-SeriesIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiencyno data24.50
Architecture codenameno dataAlder Lake-N (2023)
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

Apple M1 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.064 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache2 MB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache16 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors16000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M1 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataIntel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)no data6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Apple M1 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M1 8-Core GPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 5.19
+233%
Processor N200 1.56

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M1 1072
+389%
Processor N200 219

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Apple M1 208
+84.1%
Processor N200 113

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.19 1.56
Integrated graphics card 14.54 3.29
Recency 10 November 2020 3 January 2023
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm

Apple M1 has a 232.7% higher aggregate performance score, 341.9% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The Apple M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1
M1
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2230 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 145 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M1 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.