Processor N50 vs Apple M1
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 outperforms Processor N50 by a whopping 195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M1 and Processor N50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1194 | 2024 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 27.60 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M1 and Processor N50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 16000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M1 and Processor N50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 and Processor N50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Apple M1 and Processor N50 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 and Processor N50 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 and Processor N50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M1 8-Core GPU | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 750 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 and Processor N50.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.17 | 1.75 |
| Integrated graphics card | 14.54 | 2.29 |
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
Apple M1 has a 195.4% higher aggregate performance score, 534.9% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Processor N50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.
The Apple M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N50 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 and Processor N50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
