Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 vs Apple M1 Pro
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 Pro outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 by a whopping 1942% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M1 Pro and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 706 | 2846 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M-Series | 2x AMD Turion Ultra |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.43 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Griffin (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M1 Pro and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 10 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.22 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | 2.9 MB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 28 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 33700 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M1 Pro and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | S1g2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2064 ‑ 3220 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Pro and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 65 nm, 1.1-1.125V |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 Pro and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.23 | 0.55 |
| Recency | 18 October 2021 | 3 June 2008 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 2 |
| Threads | 10 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2064 Watt | 35 Watt |
Apple M1 Pro has a 1941.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86, on the other hand, has 5797.1% lower power consumption.
The Apple M1 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
