EPYC Embedded 8434P vs Apple M1 Max

VS

Primary details

Comparing Apple M1 Max and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking526not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameno dataSiena (2023−2024)
Release date18 October 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M1 Max and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads1096
Base clock speed2.06 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache2.9 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data4x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors57000 Million35,500 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Apple M1 Max and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataSP6
Power consumption (TDP)2060 ‑ 3220 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Max and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 Max and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 Max and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 Max 32-Core GPUN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 Max and EPYC Embedded 8434P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 October 2021 1 October 2024
Physical cores 10 48
Threads 10 96
Power consumption (TDP) 2060 Watt 200 Watt

EPYC Embedded 8434P has an age advantage of 2 years, 380% more physical cores and 860% more threads, and 930% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M1 Max and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M1 Max is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 8434P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Max and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Max
M1 Max
AMD EPYC Embedded 8434P
EPYC Embedded 8434P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 684 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M1 Max or EPYC Embedded 8434P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.