Xeon 6731E vs Ambiq Apollo 3.5

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Xeon 6731E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Architecture codenameCortex-M4FSierra Forest (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)3 June 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,121

Detailed specifications

Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Xeon 6731E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)96
Threads196
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1/1 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data4 MB (per module)
L3 cacheno data96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm5 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Xeon 6731E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data4710
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Xeon 6731E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Xeon 6731E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Xeon 6731E are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Xeon 6731E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Xeon 6731E.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data88

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 96
Threads 1 96
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm

Xeon 6731E has 9500% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Xeon 6731E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ambiq Apollo 3.5 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6731E is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Xeon 6731E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Ambiq Apollo 3.5
Ambiq Apollo 3.5
Intel Xeon 6731E
Xeon 6731E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 75 votes

Rate Ambiq Apollo 3.5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6731E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ambiq Apollo 3.5 or Xeon 6731E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.