Processor 300 vs Ambiq Apollo 3.5

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data9.28
Architecture codenameCortex-M4FRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateno data8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1/1 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data1700
Power consumption (TDP)no data46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Processor 300.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm

Processor 300 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Processor 300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ambiq Apollo 3.5 is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Ambiq Apollo 3.5
Ambiq Apollo 3.5
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 75 votes

Rate Ambiq Apollo 3.5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ambiq Apollo 3.5 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.