EPYC 9375F vs AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ

Primary details

Comparing AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD K6-III+no data
Architecture codenameK6-III (1999−2000)Turin (2024)
Release date18 April 2000 (24 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,306

Detailed specifications

AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speedno data3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed0.48 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate95 MT/sno data
Multiplier5no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography0.18 µm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors21 Million66,520 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ and EPYC 9375F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2000 10 October 2024
Physical cores 1 32
Threads 1 64

EPYC 9375F has an age advantage of 24 years, and 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ and EPYC 9375F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ is a notebook processor while EPYC 9375F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ and EPYC 9375F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ
AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ
AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate AMD-K6-III /475ACZ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about AMD-K6-III+/475ACZ or EPYC 9375F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.