EPYC 9475F vs AMD-K6-III/333AFR

VS

Primary details

Comparing AMD-K6-III/333AFR and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD K6-IIIno data
Architecture codenameK6-III (1999−2000)Turin (2024)
Release date13 May 1999 (25 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,592

Detailed specifications

AMD-K6-III/333AFR and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads196
Base clock speedno data3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate95.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier3.5no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography0.25 µm4 nm
Die size118 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors21 Million66,520 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on AMD-K6-III/333AFR and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by AMD-K6-III/333AFR and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by AMD-K6-III/333AFR and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD-K6-III/333AFR and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by AMD-K6-III/333AFR and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 1999 10 October 2024
Physical cores 1 48
Threads 1 96

EPYC 9475F has an age advantage of 25 years, and 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between AMD-K6-III/333AFR and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that AMD-K6-III/333AFR is a desktop processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between AMD-K6-III/333AFR and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD AMD-K6-III/333AFR
AMD-K6-III/333AFR
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate AMD-K6-III/333AFR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about AMD-K6-III/333AFR or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.