Processor N50 vs A9-9425
Aggregate performance score
Processor N50 outperforms A9-9425 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A9-9425 and Processor N50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2029 | 2022 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | no data |
Power efficiency | 10.90 | 27.55 |
Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A9-9425 and Processor N50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 124.5 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 105 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A9-9425 and Processor N50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FT4 | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Processor N50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
A9-9425 and Processor N50 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Processor N50 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Processor N50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9425 and Processor N50.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.76 | 1.78 |
Integrated graphics card | 1.48 | 2.29 |
Recency | 31 May 2016 | 3 January 2023 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Processor N50 has a 1.1% higher aggregate performance score, 54.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A9-9425 and Processor N50.
Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Processor N50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.