Pentium D 915 vs A9-9425

VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9425
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.73
+497%
Pentium D 915
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 95 Watt
0.29

A9-9425 outperforms Pentium D 915 by a whopping 497% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9425 and Pentium D 915 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20313110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.910.29
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Presler (2005−2007)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)23 July 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$74

Detailed specifications

A9-9425 and Pentium D 915 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)16 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per die)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size124.5 mm22x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C63 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million376 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 and Pentium D 915 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT4LGA775,PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Pentium D 915. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A9-9425 and Pentium D 915 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Pentium D 915 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Pentium D 915. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9425 1.73
+497%
Pentium D 915 0.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A9-9425 1512
+225%
Pentium D 915 465

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.73 0.29
Recency 31 May 2016 23 July 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

A9-9425 has a 496.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The A9-9425 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium D 915 in performance tests.

Be aware that A9-9425 is a notebook processor while Pentium D 915 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Pentium D 915, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9425
A9-9425
Intel Pentium D 915
Pentium D 915

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1534 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 66 votes

Rate Pentium D 915 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9425 or Pentium D 915, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.