Athlon X2 4050e vs A9-9425

Primary details

Comparing A9-9425 and Athlon X2 4050e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2029not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.91no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Brisbane (2007−2008)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)April 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9425 and Athlon X2 4050e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.1 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size124.5 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 and Athlon X2 4050e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT4AM2
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Athlon X2 4050e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Athlon X2 4050e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Athlon X2 4050e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

A9-9425 has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A9-9425 and Athlon X2 4050e. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A9-9425 is a notebook processor while Athlon X2 4050e is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Athlon X2 4050e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9425
A9-9425
AMD Athlon X2 4050e
Athlon X2 4050e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1533 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate Athlon X2 4050e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9425 or Athlon X2 4050e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.