Processor N95 vs A9-9420e

VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9420e
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.70
Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.18
+354%

Processor N95 outperforms A9-9420e by a whopping 354% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9420e and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27211617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency4.4220.06
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9420e and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data0.1 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A9-9420e and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAIntel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9420e and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A9-9420e and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9420e and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9420e and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9420e and Processor N95.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9420e 0.70
Processor N95 3.18
+354%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A9-9420e 97
Processor N95 445
+359%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 3.18
Integrated graphics card 1.48 2.30
Recency 1 June 2018 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Processor N95 has a 354.3% higher aggregate performance score, 55.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Processor N95 is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9420e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9420e and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 150 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 724 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9420e or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.