EPYC 4584PX vs A9-9420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9420
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.94
EPYC 4584PX
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
37.79
+3920%

EPYC 4584PX outperforms A9-9420 by a whopping 3920% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9420 and EPYC 4584PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking250582
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.70
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency5.9329.80
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A9-9420 and EPYC 4584PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed3 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache160 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size125 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C47 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A9-9420 and EPYC 4584PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9420 and EPYC 4584PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9420 and EPYC 4584PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9420 and EPYC 4584PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R5AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9420 and EPYC 4584PX.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9420 0.94
EPYC 4584PX 37.79
+3920%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A9-9420 1498
EPYC 4584PX 60033
+3908%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 37.79
Recency 31 May 2016 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

A9-9420 has 700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4584PX, on the other hand, has a 3920.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4584PX is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9420 in performance tests.

Be aware that A9-9420 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4584PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9420 and EPYC 4584PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9420
A9-9420
AMD EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 511 votes

Rate A9-9420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate EPYC 4584PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9420 or EPYC 4584PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.