Pentium M 715 vs A9-9410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9410
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96
+500%
Pentium M 715
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.16

A9-9410 outperforms Pentium M 715 by a whopping 500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9410 and Pentium M 715 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25033303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgePentium M
Power efficiency6.050.72
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)23 June 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9410 and Pentium M 715 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cacheno data32 KB
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size125 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.988V-1.34V

Compatibility

Information on A9-9410 and Pentium M 715 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9410 and Pentium M 715. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A9-9410 and Pentium M 715 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9410 and Pentium M 715 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9410 and Pentium M 715. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR2
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410 and Pentium M 715 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9410 and Pentium M 715 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9410 and Pentium M 715.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9410 0.96
+500%
Pentium M 715 0.16

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A9-9410 23.95
+380%
Pentium M 715 115

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 0.16
Recency 31 May 2016 23 June 2004
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 7 Watt

A9-9410 has a 500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 715, on the other hand, has 114.3% lower power consumption.

The A9-9410 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 715 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9410 and Pentium M 715, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9410
A9-9410
Intel Pentium M 715
Pentium M 715

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 115 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 4 votes

Rate Pentium M 715 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9410 or Pentium M 715, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.