Ultra 9 288V vs A8 Pro-7150B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8 Pro-7150B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
0.96
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.52
+1204%

Core Ultra 9 288V outperforms A8 Pro-7150B by a whopping 1204% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8 Pro-7150B and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2504623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Kaverino data
Power efficiency4.7839.50
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

A8 Pro-7150B and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8 Pro-7150B and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP3Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8 Pro-7150B and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A8 Pro-7150B and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8 Pro-7150B and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8 Pro-7150B and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsArc 140V
iGPU core count6no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8 Pro-7150B and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8 Pro-7150B and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8 Pro-7150B and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8 Pro-7150B 0.96
Ultra 9 288V 12.52
+1204%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8 Pro-7150B 1528
Ultra 9 288V 19895
+1202%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 12.52
Recency 4 June 2014 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 30 Watt

A8 Pro-7150B has 57.9% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has a 1204.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the A8 Pro-7150B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8 Pro-7150B and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8 Pro-7150B
A8 Pro-7150B
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 11 votes

Rate A8 Pro-7150B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 35 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8 Pro-7150B or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.