Xeon L5630 vs A8-7650K
Aggregate performance score
A8-7650K outperforms Xeon L5630 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A8-7650K and Xeon L5630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1932 | 1963 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.24 | 0.10 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Series | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.96 | 4.50 |
Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
Release date | 7 January 2015 (9 years ago) | 16 March 2010 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $152 | $1,100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
A8-7650K has 140% better value for money than Xeon L5630.
Detailed specifications
A8-7650K and Xeon L5630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 245 mm2 | 239 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | 63 °C |
Number of transistors | 2,411 million | 1,170 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on A8-7650K and Xeon L5630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | FM2+ | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 40 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7650K and Xeon L5630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | SSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VT | Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
PAE | no data | 40 Bit |
Security technologies
A8-7650K and Xeon L5630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7650K and Xeon L5630 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7650K and Xeon L5630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 288 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 3 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | no data |
iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
Number of pipelines | 384 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-7650K and Xeon L5630 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8-7650K and Xeon L5630 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7650K and Xeon L5630.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.97 | 1.90 |
Recency | 7 January 2015 | 16 March 2010 |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 40 Watt |
A8-7650K has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon L5630, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 137.5% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-7650K and Xeon L5630.
Note that A8-7650K is a desktop processor while Xeon L5630 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7650K and Xeon L5630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.