Celeron 3765U vs A8-7650K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7650K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.04
+149%

A8-7650K outperforms Celeron 3765U by a whopping 149% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7650K and Celeron 3765U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19242607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Intel Celeron
Power efficiency1.964.98
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date7 January 2015 (9 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$152$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7650K and Celeron 3765U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C105 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A8-7650K and Celeron 3765U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7650K and Celeron 3765U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A8-7650K and Celeron 3765U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7650K and Celeron 3765U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7650K and Celeron 3765U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7650K and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7650K and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.2/12
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7650K and Celeron 3765U.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7650K 2.04
+149%
Celeron 3765U 0.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7650K 3123
+149%
Celeron 3765U 1252

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.04 0.82
Recency 7 January 2015 1 June 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

A8-7650K has a 148.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron 3765U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The A8-7650K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.

Note that A8-7650K is a desktop processor while Celeron 3765U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7650K and Celeron 3765U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7650K
A8-7650K
Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 190 votes

Rate A8-7650K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7650K or Celeron 3765U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.