Xeon W-3375 vs A8-7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7600
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.07
Xeon W-3375
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
37.91
+1731%

Xeon W-3375 outperforms A8-7600 by a whopping 1731% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7600 and Xeon W-3375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking190787
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.9613.04
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-7600 and Xeon W-3375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)38
Threads476
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on A8-7600 and Xeon W-3375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7600 and Xeon W-3375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A8-7600 and Xeon W-3375 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7600 and Xeon W-3375 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7600 and Xeon W-3375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channels28
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7600 and Xeon W-3375 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7600 and Xeon W-3375 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7600 and Xeon W-3375.

PCIe version3.04
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7600 2.07
Xeon W-3375 37.91
+1731%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7600 3219
Xeon W-3375 59091
+1736%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-7600 434
Xeon W-3375 1818
+319%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-7600 1056
Xeon W-3375 17713
+1577%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.07 37.91
Recency 31 July 2014 29 July 2021
Physical cores 4 38
Threads 4 76
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 270 Watt

A8-7600 has 315.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3375, on the other hand, has a 1731.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 850% more physical cores and 1800% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3375 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7600 in performance tests.

Note that A8-7600 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3375 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7600 and Xeon W-3375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7600
A8-7600
Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 330 votes

Rate A8-7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7600 or Xeon W-3375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.