Ultra 7 265K vs A8-5550M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-5550M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.18
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.22
+3054%

Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms A8-5550M by a whopping 3054% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-5550M and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking236985
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data94.56
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency3.1928.18
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-5550M and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size246 mm2243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A8-5550M and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r21851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-5550M and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

A8-5550M and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-5550M and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-5550M and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8550G (515 - 720 MHz)Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-5550M and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-5550M 1.18
Ultra 7 265K 37.22
+3054%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-5550M 1869
Ultra 7 265K 59118
+3063%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 37.22
Recency 1 June 2013 24 October 2024
Physical cores 4 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

A8-5550M has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has a 3054.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265K is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-5550M in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-5550M is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-5550M and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-5550M
A8-5550M
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 110 votes

Rate A8-5550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 86 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-5550M or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.