Athlon Gold 7220C vs A8-4557M
Primary details
Comparing A8-4557M and Athlon Gold 7220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A8-4557M and Athlon Gold 7220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1303 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A8-4557M and Athlon Gold 7220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4557M and Athlon Gold 7220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 7640G (497 - 655 MHz) | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.19 | 2.85 |
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 23 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
A8-4557M has 100% more physical cores.
Athlon Gold 7220C, on the other hand, has 139.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A8-4557M and Athlon Gold 7220C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-4557M and Athlon Gold 7220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
