FX-4130 vs A8-3870K
Aggregate performance score
FX-4130 outperforms A8-3870K by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A8-3870K and FX-4130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2162 | 2045 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.30 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.39 | 1.29 |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 20 December 2011 (12 years ago) | 27 August 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $112 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
A8-3870K and FX-4130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 V |
Compatibility
Information on A8-3870K and FX-4130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM1 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3870K and FX-4130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3870K and FX-4130 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3870K and FX-4130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6550D | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3870K and FX-4130.
| PCIe version | no data | n/a |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.47 | 1.70 |
| Recency | 20 December 2011 | 27 August 2012 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 125 Watt |
A8-3870K has 25% lower power consumption.
FX-4130, on the other hand, has a 15.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.
The FX-4130 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3870K in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3870K and FX-4130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
