EPYC 9755 vs A8-3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-3800 and EPYC 9755 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2286not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.88no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Turin (2024)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12,984

Detailed specifications

A8-3800 and EPYC 9755 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)128
Threads4256
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size228 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8-3800 and EPYC 9755 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFM1SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3800 and EPYC 9755. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3800 and EPYC 9755 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3800 and EPYC 9755. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6550DN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3800 and EPYC 9755.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 June 2011 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 128
Threads 4 256
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 500 Watt

A8-3800 has 669.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9755, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A8-3800 and EPYC 9755. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A8-3800 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9755 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3800 and EPYC 9755, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3800
A8-3800
AMD EPYC 9755
EPYC 9755

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 71 vote

Rate A8-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9755 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3800 or EPYC 9755, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.