Xeon E5502 vs A6-9500

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9500
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.18
+123%
Xeon E5502
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.53

A6-9500 outperforms Xeon E5502 by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9500 and Xeon E5502 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23552857
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.720.63
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Gainestown (2009−2010)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)30 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64$95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A6-9500 and Xeon E5502 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

A6-9500 and Xeon E5502 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.87 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2263 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9500 and Xeon E5502 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4FCLGA1366,PLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9500 and Xeon E5502. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit

Security technologies

A6-9500 and Xeon E5502 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9500 and Xeon E5502 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9500 and Xeon E5502. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data144 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidthno data19.2 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9500 and Xeon E5502 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9500 and Xeon E5502 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9500 and Xeon E5502.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9500 1.18
+123%
Xeon E5502 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9500 1869
+123%
Xeon E5502 837

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 0.53
Recency 27 July 2017 30 March 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 80 Watt

A6-9500 has a 122.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

The A6-9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5502 in performance tests.

Note that A6-9500 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5502 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9500 and Xeon E5502, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9500
A6-9500
Intel Xeon E5502
Xeon E5502

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 185 votes

Rate A6-9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9500 or Xeon E5502, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.